<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the sounds of God, to the sounds of ohhhhhhhh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://idahoradionews.com/index.php/2006/07/27/from-the-sounds-of-god-to-the-sounds-of-ohhhhhhhh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://idahoradionews.com/index.php/2006/07/27/from-the-sounds-of-god-to-the-sounds-of-ohhhhhhhh/</link>
	<description>News, notes and the inside scoop on Idaho's radio industry &#38; beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 04:43:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://idahoradionews.com/index.php/2006/07/27/from-the-sounds-of-god-to-the-sounds-of-ohhhhhhhh/comment-page-1/#comment-37686</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2006 05:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idahoradionews.com/go/archives/2006/07/27/from-the-sounds-of-god-to-the-sounds-of-ohhhhhhhh/#comment-37686</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been following this from a Usenet group about Bay area radio for a while. I reckon it&#039;s a tease to build interest and since I gather that it&#039;s already past and it&#039;s been in the big rags before the last part of the poultry past over this fence...well, as they say...

Stay tuned (OHHH)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been following this from a Usenet group about Bay area radio for a while. I reckon it&#8217;s a tease to build interest and since I gather that it&#8217;s already past and it&#8217;s been in the big rags before the last part of the poultry past over this fence&#8230;well, as they say&#8230;</p>
<p>Stay tuned (OHHH)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don@IdahoRadio</title>
		<link>http://idahoradionews.com/index.php/2006/07/27/from-the-sounds-of-god-to-the-sounds-of-ohhhhhhhh/comment-page-1/#comment-37398</link>
		<dc:creator>Don@IdahoRadio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 15:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idahoradionews.com/go/archives/2006/07/27/from-the-sounds-of-god-to-the-sounds-of-ohhhhhhhh/#comment-37398</guid>
		<description>Actually, for a switch - I was right the first time:

&quot;Songs with little in common except suggestive titles and lyrics fill the playlist, including &quot;Why Don&#039;t We Do It in the Road&quot; by The Beatles, &quot;Sexual Healing&quot; by Marvin Gaye and &quot;Nasty&quot; by Janet Jackson. Tamer songs are heated up by adding recorded moans and groans.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, for a switch &#8211; I was right the first time:</p>
<p>&#8220;Songs with little in common except suggestive titles and lyrics fill the playlist, including &#8220;Why Don&#8217;t We Do It in the Road&#8221; by The Beatles, &#8220;Sexual Healing&#8221; by Marvin Gaye and &#8220;Nasty&#8221; by Janet Jackson. Tamer songs are heated up by adding recorded moans and groans.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The</title>
		<link>http://idahoradionews.com/index.php/2006/07/27/from-the-sounds-of-god-to-the-sounds-of-ohhhhhhhh/comment-page-1/#comment-37389</link>
		<dc:creator>The</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 08:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://idahoradionews.com/go/archives/2006/07/27/from-the-sounds-of-god-to-the-sounds-of-ohhhhhhhh/#comment-37389</guid>
		<description>Actually, according to the news story, it&#039;s the NON suggestive songs which are mixed with moaning.  Anyway, am I crazy or is this station cruising for a bruising; won&#039;t the FCC claim that this is &quot;titillation&quot; and start to fine them per incident?  (Yes, I&#039;m fully aware that this is a stunt and the station will soon switch to some other format.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, according to the news story, it&#8217;s the NON suggestive songs which are mixed with moaning.  Anyway, am I crazy or is this station cruising for a bruising; won&#8217;t the FCC claim that this is &#8220;titillation&#8221; and start to fine them per incident?  (Yes, I&#8217;m fully aware that this is a stunt and the station will soon switch to some other format.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

