Idaho Radio News Etc.

News, notes and the inside scoop on Idaho’s radio industry & beyond
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact: tips, questions, ideas

Behind the curtain: Why BSU picked Peak

Don Day | July 20, 2008

Related: Behler was Peak’s third choice

© 2008 Idaho Radio News

The battle for the rights to broadcast Boise State University Athletics on a local radio station has been unusually contentious – and public.

Idaho Radio News obtained nearly 200 pages of documents related to Peak Broadcasting’s acquisition of the radio rights to Boise State University sports. The documents were obtained under Idaho’s open records law, and were so voluminous that the university had to spend staff time to cull and redact the records (don’t worry taxpayers, I paid the $47 bill). IRN also reviewed an audiotape of a June meeting of the Idaho State Board of Education where Citadel tried to push for a rebid of the contract, and Boise State was put in the position of defending its choice of Peak Broadcasting.

We’ve also looked at several versions of the contract and e-mails between Peak executives and Boise State officials.

The records help paint a better picture of not only how Peak was awarded the contract, but how and why it landed on Bob Behler and Jadon Dailey as its broadcast team for this fall’s football games.

Citadel’s last stand

Peak Broadcasting and KIDO were officially awarded the contract in April – with the new deal set to start as soon as the 35-year relationship with Citadel and KBOI ended in June.

Just before KBOI’s clock ran out, Kelly A. Cameron, an attorney for Boise firm Perkins-Coie made a short presentation on behalf of Citadel to the State Board.

“I’m not here to today to convince, but to raise our concerns,” Cameron said.

Cameron helped lay out Citadel’s case for why it wasn’t considered fairly. The bottom line, in Citadel’s estimation: cash. Citadel claimed it put forth more money toward the deal, and other factors like “enthusiasm” shouldn’t be considered.

“The financials of Citadel’s proposal was [sic] just superior,” he said. “Our suggested remedy for this would be to rebid.”

Later that day, the Board took up the matter, and Kevin Satterlee, attorney for Boise State said that while Peak’s bid was technically worth more, the incentives put forth by Peak far outweighed the cash.

Satterlee also emphasized that Peak’s bid included incentives for post-season play, which if the football team reached a bowl game or men’s basketball team made it to the NCAA or NIT tournament in one of the two years, Peak’s bid would actually pay out more money.

It’s the network

One of the key factors in awarding the bid to Peak was the creation of a region-wide network of affiliated stations. Peak’s proposal provided for stations across Idaho and throughout the region. Once the deal was signed, Peak SVP Kevin Godwin lined up affiliates in Ontario, McCall, Twin Falls, Idaho Falls, Pocatello and into Oregon and Washington. Citadel’s proposal provided for two markets: KBOI and a Spokane affiliate.

“KBOI has a very strong signal that reaches out across some parts of Idaho,” BSU President Dr. Robert Kustra said. “As strong as that signal is, it misses quite a bit of Idaho, and it misses our surrounding states. KIDO in their proposal offered to extend coverage of Boise State University athletics beyond the KBOI contract by signing up affiliates throughout the state and beyond the state.”

Satterlee estimated the value of that network at between $700,000 and $1 million – if Boise State were to go out and purchase airtime for its games to air on those stations.

But Cameron said that was unfair – since Citadel’s network, such as it is, also has value.

“I’ve not seen any basis for $1 million,” he said. “Peak didn’t put that number in (the bid). Citadel had also proposed a network, not the same as the network Peak proposed, but certainly not at a value of zero.”

The $700,000-$1 million figure determined by the school appears to have come from an estimate given by Godwin. In a spreadsheet outlining the value of promotions and airtime on the eleven stations in the Bronco Sports Network, Godwin came up with a figure of $496,642 per year – or $993,284 over the life of the contract. The value of just the airtime alone is estimated at $729,284.

Citadel valued its network at $350,000.

Broncos En Espanol

Another key factor cited was the creation of a Spanish-language affiliate. But Peak tried to finesse that part of the deal to a degree that Boise State felt compelled to remind Peak of how important the Spanish-language portion of the broadcasts were to the winning bid.

Godwin wanted to remove the Spanish-language portion of the deal from the final contract.

“(E)verything looks fine except for the commitment you are asking of us for Spanish broadcasts,” Godwin wrote. “I would prefer to leave that out of this contract and work with [sic] to secure a subcontractor agreement outside of the contract.”

Godwin said he “put the brakes” on the Spanish portion of the deal (with KWEI) because of liability concerns.

“We will work diligently to get a local Spanish broadcasting partner and secure the subcontractor agreement. But as for this BSU/Peak contract…there are two many variables & uncertainties at this point for us to commit to that network addition in our agreement.”

On June 12th, BSU General Counsel Satterlee said in no uncertain terms that this line of thinking wouldn’t fly. The “ground breaking” addition of the Spanish-language affiliate was key to the award.

“I… appreciate that we need to make sure that Peak and the University are covered as far as the liability of a third party station being involved,” Satterlee wrote to Godwin. “However, it is the fact of that new ground breaking that was the basis of the award of the contract to Peak. It was Peak’s proposal that included a Spanish language broadcast as part of the radio network and it was the creation of the network that was a pre-requisite to the contract award.”

“We need to find a way to make this work,” Satterlee wrote.

The formation of the Bronco Sports Network – and the Spanish portion of it in particular were noted at the June 19th State Board of Education meeting.

“Peak has committed to running our games on a Spanish station in the Treasure Valley, and that’s never been done before,” Satterlee told the board.

No value in the value

Another key point by the BSU team was that some of what Citadel proposed to do – and put value toward – actually didn’t have any value to the school.

The top item was the creation of an hour-long Saturday morning radio program. Satterlee said they tried this one time before and it “failed because it was too much of a burden to the University.”

Peak also proposed a weekly hourlong show – but the actual time-slot gave it more value in Boise State’s estimation. Peak’s show is slated to air on Wednesday evening, instead of the hectic Saturday morning period.

“Saturday morning is not a good time to have our athletics staff try and make a radio show when there is [sic] football games all through the fall and basketball games all through the winter,” Satterlee said. “While there’s quote-unquote value in the Citadel bid, there wasn’t any value to the University.”

Citadel also put $200,000 of value toward a NCAA Final Four tournament contest.

“While it does promote listenership to that station, it doesn’t promote value to the University,” he said.

The ‘inappropriate overture’

After Satterlee had a chance to defend the University’s choice of Peak Broadcasting, Dr. Kustra addressed the board one more time.

He said that his group went out of its way to be fair and equitable to all sides – and he was as surprised as anyone about the choice of Peak Broadcasting.

“I never in a million years thought the contract would be awarded to KIDO,” he said. “KBOI had a long history with Boise State, and if anybody had asked me to make the call, I would have assumed – and I did assume – that the contract would have stayed where it was for a number of years.”

Kustra said he doesn’t know Kevin Godwin – and said he doesn’t think he’s ever met him.

He mentioned several “overtures” on behalf of groups that wanted “this contract very badly.” He told the board that no back-channel requests ever came from Peak. But clearly someone at Citadel did something that Kustra thought to be improper.

“It’s particularly distressing that we bent over backwards to be fair, to be objective and to ignore some overtures that I think that were improper,” he said. “And in the end, the contract went to someone I didn’t even know.”

Godwin expressed gratitude to officials in the Athletic Department.

“Guys, I didn’t attend the SBOE meeting, but I know Kevin and Dr. Kustra put a lot of effort in defending your decision regarding the rights and I wanted to tell you how much we appreciated that.”

In the end, the State Board of Education approved the deal, and just a few days later, KIDO relaunched with a new BSU-themed logo and slogan. Over at Citadel, general manager Sandy Gamblin was fired from his post just two weeks after the decision.

Categories
Radio
Tags
Citadel, KBOI, KIDO, Peak
Comments rss
Comments rss

« Behler was Peak’s third choice J Bates to KBCI »

10 Responses to “Behind the curtain: Why BSU picked Peak”

  1. Rapidrunner says:
    July 20, 2008 at 12:44 pm

    Great job, Don…and I, for one, appreciate the time and effort you put in on your ‘homework!’ Thanks, Don!

    Reply
  2. Rainshadow says:
    July 20, 2008 at 4:18 pm

    Excellent, Don. Thanks for the insight.

    Reply
  3. Buster Bronco says:
    July 20, 2008 at 8:43 pm

    Thank you for providing the truth. I think the Statesman needs to dive into this and ask some good, hard questions of what was taking place behind closed doors. Perhaps the bidding process needs to be made public so there is accountability and fairness in the process.
    As Hamlet said, “Something is rotten in the Land of Denmark.”

    Reply
  4. RadioActive says:
    July 21, 2008 at 1:26 am

    While reading this my thoughts were of how great a job you did on this. Great research, insight and organization. I greatly appreciate the amount of personal time and money you must have had to expend in order to go behind the headlines and dig out the facts.

    Those whose comments came before mine echo what I have to say as well…. A great BIG THANK YOU!!! Now a prod to the other media in our midst to accept the challenge of going beyond the press releases and glad handing and becoming investigative journalists once again!

    Reply
  5. Rainshadow says:
    July 21, 2008 at 8:29 am

    Buster Bronco – Do you mean asking the BSU President hard hitting questions like, “If you were a tree, what kind would you be?” That seems to be the depth of journalism we can expect from the Statesman, today. Don clearly did a much better job of digging for the truth.

    Reply
  6. Buster Bronco says:
    July 21, 2008 at 2:02 pm

    I stand humbly corrected, Rainshadow. I forgot the “kids” at the Statesman are not capable of such intellectual pursuits. Since the Larry Craig debacle, we really haven’t had good investigative journalism in this market. I’m still not sure if that was investigative journalism or a witch hunt.
    Jon Hanian uncovered the Brent Coles situation for KBCI. He is now Gov. Otter’s press secretary. The lost piece I saw that resembled investigative journalism was on KTVB with Steve Appleton after the Micron layoffs.
    Keep up the great work, Don. Keep correcting me when I need it, Rainshadow.

    Reply
  7. Knows Don's Dad says:
    July 21, 2008 at 7:27 pm

    Buster Bronco
    Thank you for providing the truth. I think the Statesman needs to dive into this and ask some good, hard questions of what was taking place behind closed doors. Perhaps the bidding process needs to be made public so there is accountability and fairness in the process.
    As Hamlet said, “Something is rotten in the Land of Denmark.”

    I know I’ll probably regret asking, but exactly what nefarious plot and general skulldugery might you be alluding to?

    Reply
  8. Don@IdahoRadio says:
    July 21, 2008 at 10:19 pm

    I doubt there’s much left to uncover, really. If there was any evidence of anything nefarious or deeper to this story, it would be in my reporting – or I would continue to root around for it. This may be “just a blog,” but this is really the definitive story on the matter – and I really don’t think there’s anything else to report.

    Reply
  9. Buster Bronco says:
    July 22, 2008 at 6:25 am

    Continue to monitor the story, Don. I have a feeling things could trickle out as we go along.

    Reply
  10. Buster Bronco says:
    July 22, 2008 at 4:11 pm

    I heard a great discussion on Sean Hannity regarding why the media pays so much attention to Obama and so little to McCain. The guests (two reporters and a Democratic strategist) said Obama has captured the media’s attention as John Kennedy did in 1960. The media has become paparazzi covering Obama. they photograph his every move and cover every speech because they want you to hear what this very engaging personality says. Meanwhile, the media covering McCain is covering someone they perceive to be an “old man” who discusses the issues and is a candidate who places substance over style. Therefore, the media is biased in favor of Obama.
    Whether you agree or disagree with this conclusion is irrelevant. The issue we are discussing in this forum is why we no longer have solid investigative reporting. I have two theories: 1) It has been my personal experience the colleges and universities (at least BSU) do not teach aspiring journalists to cover stories in depth. I had a journalism professor who asked us to cover the fact women earn less than men. I challenged this stating we all know this is true. I wanted to know why and what could be done to solve the problem. The professor became angry and said he didn’t care why and what could be done. His job as a journalist was to make people aware of the issue and let society solve the issues.
    2) If it is true the media has become paparazzi: the public needs to demand more from the media. If results are not produced to the public satisfaction, the public needs to stop purchasing and consuming that medium. Society demands a lot from education. Why should they not demand the same from the media?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Rules:
- Don't defame or libel another person. Keep it civil
- Avoid profanity
- Use your real name. If you don't these rules will be more strongly enforced upon you
- Do not change your nickname. You risk being called out if I catch you
- Comments are moderated. Most are approved in 24 hours

Recent comments

  • Dave Pratt on KFXD, history revisited
  • Glenda on KFXD, history revisited
  • Dave on Pete & Joe… all day long
  • Ray Stommel on KFXD, history revisited
  • NoKateNo on Kate McGwire’s loaner car stolen
  • sara on KQLZ now “The Virus”
  • Chinpokomon99 on Wild parties down with KF-95’s old boombox
  • Theodore Dazis on Supporters: Radio host used racial slur against Obama
  • Frank Bramble on KFXD, history revisited
  • Julian Cruthirds on Pete & Joe begin radio-thon

Archives

Links

  • AllAccess
  • Boisee
  • Boise Guardian
  • BoiseWeekly
  • Engineer Exchange
  • Idaho Ad Agencies
  • Idaho Business Review
  • Idaho PR Musings
  • Hist. of ID Broadcasting
  • Idaho Weather from KTVB
  • Idaho News from KTVB
  • LostRemote
  • NewWest Boise
  • TreasuredValley
  • Radio-Locator.com
  • Idaho volunteer firefighters
  • TVBarn
  • Words & Deeds
  • First, the good news...
  • Laid Off Loser
  • Idaho Cosmetic Dentist
  • Idaho yellow pages
Copyright 2009, Don L. Day